Rhetoric versus reality in today's politics
Andy Burnham's charismatic style of communication has been vital in his first month as Prime Minister.
Though Burnham’s policy content has been criticised as being thin, one area to which he has given more detail throughout his campaign and subsequent premiership has been affordable housing.
In July, he said that the UK should no longer be 'coy' regarding the need for public control, stating that he wanted the full £39 billion Affordable Homes Programme allocation to go towards council housing.
With Angela Rayner back as Secretary of State for Housing, this appeared a hopeful, if ambitious, target, particularly in consideration of her previous support for affordable housing and council housing.
However, the realities of governing are exposing themselves, sparking the debate between whether rhetoric or reality will win out.
This week, the first £10 billion of the 10-year Affordable Homes Programme was announced. The funding will support a mix of subsidised housing in England, with a reduced target of only 60 percent of this dedicated to social renting.
Though Ministers have hailed this as a step towards the government's promise of building 300,000 affordable homes over the next 10 years, others have accused the government of 'watering down' its narrative.
This comes as reports emerge that Burnham is under increasing pressure from officials to shelve plans to take Thames Water into administration over its huge debt.
Whilst Ministers insist that no option is off the table for the water company, Burnham’s stance has softened compared to last month, when it was seen as a potential marker of the new PM committing to removing blockages in the Civil Service machine.
Perhaps this is a sign that, though a strong narrative is indeed vital, the reality of government needs more than warm words to make substantial change.
We also saw Reform UK’s proposed changes to social housing eligibility this week.
Key commitments include delivering an additional 50,000 new affordable homes each year, with priority being given to veterans, those in work and married couples. A significant portion of these homes will be exclusively for young British-born workers under the age of 35, as well as introducing strict property maintenance criteria.
Housing charities like Crisis have raised concerns that this narrative will stoke division, highlighting that it is already incredibly difficult for non-UK nationals to access social housing.
Excluding those who are not in work also risks leaving older people and those who are unable to work being refused a home, and the focus on couples with children being married is not a reflection of the reality of family life today.
As we look towards Parliament’s return at the start of September and Conference season, both the Prime Minister and the Reform UK leader will be expected to expand further on their policies.
The balance between rhetoric and reality continues, but, ultimately, the Prime Minister is the only one with the ability to drive delivery, and whose plans need to work in practice.